If you know anything about photographic artistic history, photographers like Weston were considered crazy for taking photographs and calling them art…the artist community genuinely shunned his and others ideals of what was considered “True art” because the Technology was so advanced.The argument of “Digital vs. Film” as art is so so tired…to say one is not a true artist because he/she chooses to shoot Digital is complete bogus and flat out pretentious.

I know I am fixating on that one line, but it’s junk and destroys all the good will of this article for me.

I shoot digital, have since I started…Not saying film is bad, but I made time to experiance film for a year (developing, processing, scanning, print making, color processing, dark room, enlarging. etc.) , and I didn’t like the medium…the process didn’t suit my needs.

Say what you will, call me a faux artist, but it’s not your place, nor anyones place to choose what medium inhabits true artists.I think your work is beautiful, if you want to continue to stand this strong on defending film, you have my support and keep blazing your own trail. What I will not support is that close minded set of ideals that because people don’t shoot like you, they aren’t “real artists”.Thanks for sharing your thoughts.